|
Home Boat Details Log 1999 Photos Hydrography Journal ForBuyers Calendar SiteMap |
Our boat has many log
books. There is a log book that records the engine use and
maintenance; there is log book for recording narrative and
highlights of a voyage; and there is a log book tracks the seas,
and position of the boat as in makes its way along a passage. This
last book is a legal document that can be used to clarify the
circumstances of any mishap, but it also is the raw material for
evaluating the performance of the boat in different situations. At
the very minimum, the entries in this log are done precisely at the
time of the change of watch, on this voyage, every three hours.
We found that even in the most uncomfortable of situations, three hours was bearable with a crew of three. It allowed six hours, more or less of rest before the next time on watch. The only complication was that the hours of each man's watch changed from day to day. On a two day voyage, this problem is insignificant because the first day in harbor is spent mostly just resting and cleaning up. The following is exerpted from the ship's navigational log. The wind speed is noted in Beaufort scale, as is the sea.
As you can see, we continued on with decent headway even when bucking fairly rough seas (5 Beaufort, about 4 meters or 12 feet). We were hanging on for all we were worth because, without the sails, the boat rolled considerable and violently. We found all the drawers that didn't latch well, and all the storage places with loosely packed contents during this time.. everything that could was banging about. We also avoid eating, even drinking so as not to change being seasick. There were only three of us, and the loss of even one watch would have been more than anyone else would have wanted to bear. We tied up in Vastervik, Sweden on 28 October at 0105. At least 30 minutes was spent looking for a safe dock to tie to. We eventually settled on the town's quay for fishing boats. As it proved, this was the correct choice because this is where we were going to be rigged. The totals for the trip were 278.6 nm in 42.4 hours,
averaging 6.57 knots. The total fuel consummed was about 350
liters (92 gallons): 8.3 liters/hr (2.2 gallons/hr). This
works out to 1.26 liters (0.33 gal) per nautical mile with
the engine running at 80% full power.
When the rig arrived from Karlstad (Skarven Mast) with the sails (Eric Brolinson, also of Karlstad), the spirits lifted. At last, Mother of Perl would become a sailing vessel. There were a few complications in that some of the chainplates for the shrouds were not installed in Riga. A local welder did a beautiful and efficient job, even staying around to build a mount for the radar antenna and a few other details. The rig, stays, shrouds and sails all fit! (Well, almost, the jib was a tad too long for the forestay.) The only mishap was at the fuel dock. We managed to fill the aft head cabin and bilge with diesel instead of the port side fuel tank. The confusion of an extra unconnected deck plate over the head was solved with cold chisel and sealant. But the cost off 300 liters of fuel that needed to be pumped out and disposed off, plus a special cleaning crew made this error a bit costly. By midnight of the following Tuesday, we were absolutely certain that the boat was ready for the voyage back to Estonia.
As we settled down to our 3 hour watches, the weather became even finer. By dawn, we were experimenting with balancing the sails to see if it was true that the Spray hull steered itself. At first, the longest that we would let her take her own course without adjustment was about five minutes. (I was later to discover that she could go several hours with only a five degrees of course variation.) With wind dead astern, we found that we couldn't keep the jib filled because of the shadow caused by the mains'l. (During the Atlantic crossing, we discovered a double-reefed main solves this problem.) For next 36 hours we rolled along with following seas. It was a comfortable roll, unlike the heavy pitching that we had encounted when motoring to Sweden. As the sun was getting low on the second day, we rounded into the Tallinn Bay. It was pitch black as we approached the breakwater wall of the Pirita harbor. We had only motorsailed while in the Vastervik archepelago and during the final two hours of our approach to Pirita. The passage had been a respectable 44 hours for the distance of approximately 280 nautical miles; an average of 6.4 knots. While in the open waters of the Baltic, we had not once had to tack or gybe. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||